Portland bill going green but at what cost?


Recently Portland has seen three wind power turbines added to the scenery in the port, harbour, for me they are a great addition and do not seem an eyesore, while also doing a good job of supplying a renewable source for those that use the power.

We should all be seen to be doing the right thing for the environment and reversing any damage we collectively have created, the ozone layer is now thankfully closing due to aerosols being banned 20 or so years ago.

That itself proves we DO create damage, how could we not?

The industrial revolution was a huge contributor all that time ago and we are seeing that happen again with China having their own industrial boom.

All of us can and should do own bit for the environment, indeed reducing our carbon footprint is necessary really and it does mount up.

I think solar power itself should be on every single roof of every building in the UK, look at the sheer land-space they cover... close all the gaps between all the roofs in the UK and you have a huge mass of space that could and should be soaking up solar power to utilise, should have been implemented over the last ten years.

Closer to home though, I see the alarming news of a new "green plant" being placed in Portland harbour, not that a green plant is alarming itself but what type it is and what it leads to.

The "biofuel plant" that is being considered for Portland harbour which in my view stupid and probably creating a bigger carbon footprint than it saves, so clearly long term it's a stupid move.

The main reason for the stupidity is the fact it contributes to virgin rainforest being bulldozed and replaced with palm oil plantations and considering the short 20 year life span of these plantations it seems absurd.

Are we really to keep chipping away at the lung of the planet in the name of being "green" and isn't it a little hugely hypocritical?

Do we at Portland want to be the focus of bad press and possible protest action by those eco-warriors who will shout about how there is "nothing sustainable about it"?

Or do we at Portland want to see better sustainable green projects where we can also lead the way in taking the right action to create the right sustainable renewable energy?

Leading to great press and being seen to be showing what can be done and how.

With the natural advantages we have here around Portland we should be utilising them, what if the whole of Portland could be easily run on our natural energy produced...doable?

I think so, with wave, solar and wind all being available to us locally, all year too... I feel that we should be utilising them all.

There is good sun here in the south west UK in the summer months, with solar energy being tapped into, also being surrounded by sea we always have a steady breeze, while also having strong currents around Portland bill and nearly always we have waves, no reason all three cannot be used here.

All three types being used would mean at least there is always an input of energy, it will be rare none of them can produce energy at any given moment, true renewable energy.

There is need to "ruin" any view either, setting the plantation up a couple of miles offshore would mean no-one needs to actually see it. This is also a great south facing area for solar power so the mirrors that are used will not be bothersome with glare to people but no idea if solar and wind can be utilised offshore like wave energy.

It would also make a great control in the sense of what each output in energy each type creates and would go some way to informing us with real results what's best for the input/output ratio and in terms of cost/savings.

Having all three types in close approximate surroundings would produce some interesting results no doubt. 


With this sort on info being monetisable in several ways it would be a boost towards the initial cost of setting them up, I don't mean just sell the results, it could be consultation fees for other places where they are interested in implementing "green renewable" plants, experts and such who would be working here.


If only Portland was an independent place where we could create our agenda to benefit Portland itself and it's residents, having our own council as we once did. If only we be more like the isle of man in some ways.

Not having to fall into line with what Weymouth thinks, decides, implements.

I digress, we as an Island should have far more say on what happens here and we as a community should be able to decide what's best for the Island and its surroundings, it's future.

That includes and "green" ideas and notions which will effect more than just Portland people.
Whatever we end up with as a sustainable energy we should make certain it is not at the cost of communities or land elsewhere.

There is nothing so green as the rainforest and it should remain that way, if anything we should be growing it!.

I have no wish to see the earth's lungs being ruined for the sake of it, I would hope all of the Portland community would agree?

Yes, let's get green but let's do it the right way even if it cost more, monetary wise, short term because we owe it to be a long term success, for our children's children.

Do you agree?

Monetary Disclaimer: That link is a product, should you purchase I may gain a small payment from, pennies.

6 comments:

  1. sylv webster12.1.10

    I am in total agreement with wind farms, anything to help keep England Green. As regards the people of Portland having a say, and being listened to, I am in total agreement again, far too long have we been ruled by those over the water, we have become a faceless entity over here, as long as they have our money they ride roughshod over us all the time. We kick off and they try to appease us with a sweetener, example the Christmas Lights, thinking that we will be happy with our lot. What a pity they have forgotten that we have brains and are not stupid enough to fall for their little tricks. Perhaps we should kick off more, I don't know.

    Getting back to the main issue, yes I do feel that we should ALL make an attempt to conserve energy, recycle whatever is recyclable and help our country, and the world, to be a better place.

    Great blog Rob, keep up the good work. omg I sound like a school ma'am now.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hiya Sylv,

    Thanks for the comment, I agree we should all be doing our bit regarding our carbon footprint, many small changes add up.

    I think it's about time we had our council back, we don't need Weymouth telling us what's good for Portland, most of them never even come to Portland so they don't really have the personal connection.

    I don't agree with that, every member of the council should live in the area they oversee.

    Hard to see change and needs when you aren't there.

    Rob

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great article Rob

    I couldn't agree more, how can they call it a 'green plant' when it's anything but.

    I did hear that some eco-warriors may be coming back to this area might at least wake up more public debate and positive actoin

    Andy

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Andy,

    Thanks for the compliment. :o)

    Nothing green about it is there, ludicrous really.

    It's an insult to everyone in the world as it effects them all, chopping the lungs out of the Earth, no way to deny that.

    A joke.

    Really, damn, protesters and such, while doing the right thing in some ways making a point, but hopefully no trouble.

    I think alot can be said and done about it but the idea overall of having a green plant is admirable, wanted.

    Just the BEST green methods for the area and the rest of the world.

    If those who allow it wanna be hypocrites that's up to them, but don't effect us all with the hypocrisy.

    We definitely need this airing so to speak.

    But as for the green plant itself...

    Do it once, do it right.

    Rob

    ReplyDelete
  5. We all need to be aware that multi-national corporations have jumped on and are trying to hijack the green bandwagon the same way they are trying to control what is organic.

    We have to use common sense and recognize their double-speak. Their favorite strategy is to describe something as being beneficial when it actually does precisely the opposite of what they claim.

    This can be seen in their many "grass-roots" groups that are actually fronts for their own interests masquerading as those affected by what they are proposing.

    Biofuel has been a ridiculous proposition from the beginning. Consider the idea of using corn. "Even if the entire U.S. corn crop were used to make ethanol, the fuel would replace only twelve percent of current gasoline use."

    More information about using corn as biofuel.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very true Gail,

    There is so much smoke and mirrors within this as well as many other areas of life, then again, I think that's the the aim, confuse people with it all, while shifting their real agenda in under the radar. Shamelessly too.

    The whole thing just stinks.

    ReplyDelete